미국산 소고기 수입 찬성/반대 |
Trust is a very important virtue in the world called "International Society", in which many nations interact frequently each other. Recently, U.S. beef imports is the hottest deal of controversy in Korea for its safety. Protestors who oppose the American beef imports has claimed the rearrangement of this beef imports everyday, adding that it's only way for the people's health safety. Then, does the government have to make a rearrangement with Washington for revising rules of American beef imports? It seems not to be a good idea.
FTA is a kind of promises with a big scale. It doesn't make sense that the government suggest a rearrangement about beef imports beacuse of protests against the imports, although the agreement has been finished yet. Even if the rearrangement could be done, it would lead to next agreements of other things - cars, grains, fruits, and so on - which start at the lower positon than American. Because America risks the lower profits for the exports of beef than before it didn't conduct the rearrangement. Oqing to this risk-taking of America, Korea couldn't expect the better agreements of other products, which are really critical to Korea's economy, for they're primary products of exports overseas. On the other hand, America would gains mor benefits out of the risk of the lost for beef exports.
There is two important proponents in the agreement which makes the most utilities; there is no free of risk and trust is the best policy. Considering the two, the rearrangement won't have to be done. It is necessary to the people's health. However it only can be predicted, not known by a predict what will be shown up with U.S. beef imports. Saying a second, the profit is made from the risk. |
이것 역시 2시간이상해서 겨우;