In the given set of information, both the reading passage and the lecture deal with the solution to rescue reptiles. The lecturer casts doubt on the author’s assertion that relocating the reptiles is not a good idea by presenting three compelling counterarguments.
First of all, according to the reading passage, moving reptiles to the new place causes overpopulation. This is because there is already a large number amount of similar species living there. However, the lecturer refutes the author’s claim by stating that it is disputable. He gives an example of U.K. which relocated lizards to a new habitat and successfully rescued them from the hazard. Also, he argues that by fostering artificial environment the new place can accommodate a large quantity of reptiles.
Next, the author claims that moving the reptiles to a different area can cause the spread of disease. The disease would be serious for the other species because they are vulnerable to the exotic disease. Regarding this point, the lecturer claims that it is unconvincing. This is because if the researchers regularly visit the new site and identify the diseases and remove them, there will not be any problems.
Lastly, the lecturer contradicts the reading passage’s claim that the reptiles may be injured and killed during being captured (명사로 써주시는 것이 더 깔끔합니다) for relocating because of the lack of moisture. He argues that this is not an issue because there is a basic way to protect the reptiles, which is putting some water in the buckets. Also, he points out that by being carried in the buckets, the reptiles are able to hide from their predators.
Score: 28
Comments:
- 전체적인 구조가 잘 잡혀있습니다.
- also 다음에 콤마를 넣어주세요
- 전체적으로 주요 포인트가 모두 언급 되어있고 설명이 매우 깔끔하게 잘 되어있습니다.