▶ Your Answer :
The lecturer argues that the claims that Michelangelo forged the Laocoon are untrue. This contradicts the reading passage's claim that the Laocoon is actually a forgery created by Michelangelo. First of all, the lecturer points out that Michelangelo did not trick his friend. The speaker explains that Michelangelo and Sangallo were not rival but close friends. They painted their work together and Sangallo invited him to identify the Laocoon. This casts doubt on the reading which states that Michelangelo might have forged the Laocoon to fool his rival, Giuliano da Sangallo. In addition, according to the speaker, the similarity between the Laocoon and The Last Judgment is explained by the Lacoons' influence on Michelangelo. The speaker maintains that Michelangelo even said that the Laocoon had a influence in his art works. It represents that resemblance of two works is a general result. This rebuffs the reading passage's assertion that the Laocoon's striking resemblance to a figure in The Last Judgment means a forgery. The final point made by the speaker is that the Laocoon's purpose is very different from attracting people. The speaker says that replication was common at that time, however, a forgery was a type of frawd in the art world. If the artists' illegal action were caught, they were given the penalty like death in extreme. This refutes the reading passage's argument that forgery was a common thing during the Renaissance. Good: 24~30 점수: 24 대채로 서로 다른 정보를 가진 리딩과 리스닝을 적절하게 잘 비교하엿습니다. 하지만 비교적으로 통합형 에세이가 짧다라고 생각합니다. 제가 리딩과 리스닝을 다 본것이 아니기 때문에 혹시 빠진것이 있으면 더 넣어주시길 바랍니다. 너무 짧다라는 생각이 들기 때문에 각 리딩과 리스닝의 부연설명이 꼭 필요해보입니다. 수고많으셨습니다.
|