▶ Your Answer :
The reading passage claims that England’s archaeology has is
suffering difficulty
in (in what? 에 해당하는 내용이 없네요. 발전이 어려웠다던가의 내용을 써주세요) England.
However, the professor contradicts the reading`s claim and states that there is no crisis in archaeology in England by giving three specific
reasons.
First of all, the reading argues that
many artifacts are being destroyed because of population and demographic
changes. On the contrary, the lecturer contends that nowadays government of
England is trying to protect their treasures as much as possible by investing (paying) for a lot of money(,) and the government examines
carefully when it has have to construct something.
On top of that, the passage warrants
that archaeologists cannot afford to do their research not only because their
works require much money but also because government`s fund is not plentiful to
sustain them. On the other hand, the professor insists that fund comes from
additional private companies as well as government, so it can be used to
support their work.
Lastly, the reading passage maintains
that future of archaeology is dim because there are a few available jobs in the
area. In contrast, the lecturer thinks that many researches are being
conducted, and commercial value of it is also considerable. So he thinks that
its future is so bright.
큰 문법적인 오류는 보이지 않습니다. 다만 조금 더 욕심을 내자면 구체적으로 서술하시면 좋겠습니다. reading 과 lecturer 이 어떤 내용을 말하고 있으며 어떤 근거를 대고 있는지를 simple 한 문장으로 그러나 핵심은 모두 들어있게 쓰시면 좋을 것 같습니다~ 말이 쉽지 사실 어려운 부분입니다. 그러나 통합형 자체에서 요구하는 것이 이런 부분이기에 자꾸 연습하시는 것이 좋겠습니다. 수고하셨습니다!!! ^^ |