in retrospect they may not have chosen to submit to had they had access to information about their rate of cancer and their body’s actual condition
여기에서 to submit 다음에 to had 그리고 they had 가 동시에 나왔는지 문장구조를 확실히 짚어주세요
some are faced with the dilemma of how to remain wholly truthful to someone what undergoing medical supervision while acting in their best interests.
마찬가지로 여기서의 문장구조도 획실히 짚어주세요
Both researchers and physicians who vouch for the virtue of placebos concede that -------
여기에서 관계대명사 who다음에 전치사를 버리면 vouch 밖에 안 남는데 그럼 전치사를 목적어로 보는 건가요? 목적격 관계대명사일때는 동사 목적어 순으로 알고있습니다
According to records on file at the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA), 35% of patients who have been allotted placebos throughout drug trials claim long-term relief from symptoms
하지만 여기에서 관계대명사인데도 불구하고 who뒤에 완벽한 문장이 왜 나왔는지 이해하질 못 하겠습니다
가르쳐주세요