▶ Your Answer :
The lecturer asserts that the reading’s points are not persuasive. This casts doubt on the reading’s claim that sucralose should be banned due to several health problems.
First, the lecturer claims that sucralose is unlikely to raise does not raise the risk of developing diabetes. Numerous different things can cause diabetes. For example, sucralose in diet soda doesn’t does not (에세이에서는 줄인말을 서술하면 안됩니다) cause diabetes. Instead of that, since people who drink diet soda are usually obese, obesity can be a crucial reason for diabetes. This challenges the reading’s point that sucralose is an important factor of diabetes by increasing insulin resistance.
Second, the speaker argues that. In a laboratory test, researchers found out that the harmful compounds which consist of other chemicals and sucralose were not found in foods cooked with high temperature. This refutes the reading’s claim that choloropropanols created when sucralose is used for cooking may lead to health problems such as cancer.
Finally, the lecturer contends that there is no evidence that sucralose causes allergic symptoms. Anecdotal records are not reliable. Also, a lot of tests demonstrate that sucralose is safe for human consumption. This opposes the reading’s explanation that sucralose has an effect on allergic reactors.
점수: 22 리딩에 대한 정보가 많이 부족한 통합형 에세이입니다. 통합형 에세이에서 가장 중요한 부분을 차지하는 것은 한 주제에 대하여서 서로 다른 정보를 가지고 있는 리딩과 리스닝이 어떻게 비교하고 반박을 하는 것인지를 보는 것 입니다. 지금 이 에세이 같은 경우에 있어서는 리딩에 대한 부분을 각 단락에서 한 문장으로만 서술하였는데. 한 문장으로 끝내는 것 보다는 리스닝을 좀 더 반박할 수 있는 부분들을 더 서술하시길 바랍니다. 수고많으셨습니다. |