▶ Your Answer :The lecturer forms the argument that we aren't getting any closer to solving why moai were built. In stark contrast, the reading passage claims that there are three opinions for why moai were constructed.
To begin with, the lecturer asserts that the idea that the statues were made to reward competition is easy to discount. (Why did you use this word?) To be specific, the number of statues exceeded the number when we count one per year. 900 statues over 5 centuries. This doesn't add up. (Unclear) This casts doubt on the reading passage's claim that moai were made to congratulate triumph every year.
Furthermore, the lecturer maintains that the claim that moai were intermediate between human and divine has problems. In particular, moai's direction of gaze is far from universal. Also, the mounds standing near the moai doesn't have any evidence of religious ceremonies. This refutes the reading passage, which states that moai were beings that connected humans and gods.
Finally, the lecturer contends that the idea that moai were reverence for ancestors is too farfetched. To elaborate in detail, many moai mostly face north and east not only west. Moreover, the DNA is related to Polynesians who also settled north and south. This makes us hard to confirm that original inhabitants came from the west. This detracts from the reading passage's argument that moai were built to worship ancestors.
채점기준표 | Grammar | Contents | Example | Coherence | 점수 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | Score | Limited 10-17 | - 첫 번째 내용은 잘못된 문장으로 이해하기 어렵습니다.
- 두 번째 내용은 religious ceremony라 주장한 근거를 정확히 보여주세요. - 마지막 내용은 reverence for ancestors 와 Polynesians의 관련성에 대해 언급하여 주세요.
|
|