▶ Your Answer :
The lecturer argues that we don’t understand how the dog
originated. This contradicts the reading passage’s claim that we understand how,
when, where dogs became domesticated.
First, the lecturer suggests
that the theory which wolf became a dog is hard to believe. As the hunting style
of ancient human and wolf is different, the existence of wolf wouldn’t be helpful. Moreover, wolf
calf became aggressive when they get older, so they couldn’t be domesticated by
human. This casts doubt on the reading passage’s claim that dogs are originated
from wild wolf.
Second, the lecturer explains
that the originate of dog is earlier than 16,000 years. This is because they
found pare of foot prints by a young boy and a dog and after a research, it discovered
as a foot print which made 26thoushand years ago. This counters the reading passage’s
claim that dogs are domesticated approximately 16,000 years ago.
Finally, the lecturer asserts that the originated of
domesticated dog is from multiple places. The oldest dog bones are scatted all
over the world not only in the China. Also, there is resent found that the there
are four different ancestors of domesticated dog. This refutes that reading passage’s
claim that domesticated dogs are first emerged only in China. Good: 24~30 점수: 24 리딩에 대한 정보가 많이 부족한 에세이인거 같습니다. 통합형 에세이에서 가장 중요한 부분을 차지하는 것 중에 하나는 리딩과 리스닝을 얼마나 적절하게 비교하였는 가 입니다. 지금 이 에세이 같은 경우에 있어서는 리스닝에 대한 정보는 충분하게 서술하였습니다. 하지만 리딩에 대한 정보가 너무 부족합니다. 한 문장으로 각 이유에 대한 리딩의 정보를 끝내는 것 보다는 리스닝을 좀 더 반박 할 수 있는 부분들을 서술하시는 것이 좋을거 같습니다. 수고많으셨습니다.
|