▶ Your Answer :
In the reading passage, it is argued that wave farms positively have positive impacts on the environment. However, the lecture disagrees with the reading passage’s argument saying that it is illusionary for us to believe the environmental benefits of these wave farms. First, the lecturer says that power generators were sometimes broken down and disrupted due to the technical difficulties. A wave energy converter is known to malfunction often, letting the energy in it fluctuates in a wrong way. This casts doubt on the reading passage’s suggestion that wave farms are dependable and constant power generators. Next, the lecturer points out that wave farms’ floating conductors release toxic chemical lubricants with negative environmental effects if leaked into the coastal areas. This counters the reading passage’s statement that wave farms are eco-friendly, compared to their precedents burning fossil fuels and releasing greenhouse gases and other pollutants. Finally, the lecturer argues that wave farms shade their beautifully surrounding nature, due to their high visibility and strong shades. Their proximity to the shore makes matters worse when it comes to viewers trying to enjoy the coastal landscape. This disagrees with the reading passage’s assertion that wave farms don’t have a negative impact on the natural beauty, since they are smaller in size and easier to float or stay near the surface of the water compared to coal or nuclear energy generators.
채점기준표 | Grammar | Contents | Example | Coherence | 점수 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | Score | Fair 18-23 |
- 다소 어색한 표현이 보이나 minor한 편입니다.
- 세 가지 포인트들은 대체적으로 잘 제시되어 있는 편입니다.
|
|