Smart cars |
In this set of materials both the reading and the lecturer deal with smart cars. Regarding this issue, the lecturer goes on to say that smart cars has several disadvantages. On the other hand, the writer’s brings up several points that contradict this argument. First, the lecturer claims that it is not fuel efficient. It has lower mile per gasoline car manufacture promised. For example car manufacture said one gasoline runs 60 miles. However, actually it runs only 37 miles. This refutes the writer’s viewpoint claim that smart cars economical and fuel – efficient. For instance, raise gasoline price American customer embracing smart cars. Second, according to the lecturer, smart cars increase number of congestion. This is because manufacture produce new model, so increase vehicles. Another point is that it rides two people, so people needed new automobiles. This refutes the writer’s says that it has streamline size. It is easy maneuver. Thus it downsize traffic congestion. Lastly, the lecturer argues that smart cars deadly vehicles. This means that it is two small. Thus other driver’s can not see and unsafe. Also it is crushed in accident. This refutes the reading passage’s argument that it is safer. This is because can not faster 85 mile, it might not raise accident. In addition it’s designed safety-cage. |
이렇게 적었습니다. 여러 고수님들의 첨삭 부탁드립니다.
좋은 하루 되세요. ^^