▶ Your Answer : According to reading passage, prescribed burning is actually dangerous and ineffective. However, the points made in the article totally disagree with the lecturer's claim that it has a lot of advantages. Most of all Firstly, the article says that prescribed burning can make forested area become vulnerable to invasive species and cause ecological imbalance. On the contrary, the lecturer expresses doubt on this point by asserting that prescribed burning is helpful. The lecturer asserts that it makes new plants grow and the area more nutritious so plants grow further. In addition, it is helpful for animals because it prevents fire. Besides, Furthermore, the reading argues that prescribed burning is hard to control. The perspective This perspective, however, is challenged by the lecturer's claim that the example from the reading passage is one of few cases. This is done by highly trained professionals. The last point made in the article is that there is a better and less risk alternative forestry management way: disking. In contrast, the lecturer contradicts this point by asserting that it is very cost-effective. Prescribed burning is the cheapest extant method to manage forest. Good: 24~30 점수: 26 대립된 리딩과 리스닝을 잘 비교 하였습니다. 다만 아쉬운점은 두 번째 세 번째 바디입니다. 이 바디들은 첫 번째 바디와 다르게 정보가 충분하게 들어가 있지 않다라는 느낌이 듭니다. 전반적으로 바디의 양이 짧기 때문에, 본인이 리딩과 리스닝을 숙지하실 때 충분한 정보들을 제공 하는게 더 좋을 거 같습니다. 또한 바디를 시작할 때 적절한 단어 선택을 꼭 하시길 바랍니다. 수고많으셧습니다. |