▶ Your Answer :
In the reading passage, there is ample support for the author's claim that Sucralose should be prohibited due to the health problems related to it. The professor in the lecture gives several reasons as a rebuttal to the author's point.
First, the professor in the lecture insists that it can't set off severe diabetes. For example, it usually contains some extent of insulin that can cause this ailment but, it is actually the similar amount of the substances to those of tomatoes. Rather, the obesity is the key reasons to cause the diabetes. This casts doubt on the reading passage's claim that having this substance will cause hideous diabetes because it contains lots of insulin that leads to this ailment.
Next, the professor in the lecture contends that it doesn't produce severely devastating substances while cooking. To be specific, there isn't any reliable evidence that while cooking the hazardous amount of substances are made. Actually, the normal level of the material is produced during proper cooking. This counters the reading passage's assertion that once these substances reach a high temperature, it causes harmful resources.
Finally, the professor in the lecture argues that it doesn't cause strong allergic feedback. For example, we usually contain the antibiotic resources hedging about serious problem caused by this materials. So, It just leads to not harmful level of reaction. This refutes the reading passage's suggestion that significant number of people suffer from some symptom after having meals containing it.
|