▶ Your Answer : In the reading passage there is ample support for the author's claim that Etruscans migrated from Turkey. However, the professor in the lecture give several reasons as a rebuttal to the author's point. First of all, the professor contends that the DNA analyze conducted in 2004 is hard to believe. The bones which have been researched is from more than one thousand years ago. Moreover, she says the sample would be very contaminated to convince. This cast doubt on the reading passage's claim that remains on the gravesite have shown genetic signs that linking Etruscans with Turkey. Next, tht professor insists that the fact that Etruscans used similar language with Turkey has not been prove. This is because even among the different languages, they can have similar language. Also, even though they had used same language, the alphabet could be different depends on the reigion they settled. This counters the reading passages assertion that the their inscription and text is similar to Turkey and they had different alphabet from adjacent nations. Finally, the professor argues that there is no reason to believe that they had same funerary tradition with Turkey. Rather, Italy had that custom in ten thousand years ago. It was even before Etruscans came to the region they popularized. This refutes the reading passage's suggestion that they cremated ashes in elaborate urns as Turkey did.
점수: 22 리딩에 대한 정보가 많이 부족한 통합형 에세이입니다. 통합형 에세이에서 가장 중요한 부분을 차지하는 것은 한 주제에 대하여서 서로 다른 정보를 가지고 있는 리딩과 리스닝이 어떻게 비교하고 반박을 하는 것인지를 보여주는 거 입니다. 지금 이 에세이 같은 경우는 리딩에 대한 부분의 정보가 많이 부족합니다. 한 문장으로 리딩에 대한 부분을 서술하는 것 보다는 리스닝에 대한 부분을 더 정확하고 명확하게 서술하시길 바랍니다. 수고많으셨습니다. |