▶ Your Answer : The reading passage contends that the Maya
Empire collapse can be fully explained by three theories. On the other hand,
the lecturer brings up several points that contradict this argument to contradict this argument.
First,
the speaker argues that it is unlikely that the Maya Empire was destroyed by
revolution the Mayan Empire was not destroyed by revolution. The reason is that there is no record related to social turmoil,
even though its riding system could be found other evidence. Also, the Maya
Empire is decentralized and it means that they didn’t its own government and
ruler in which it does not have its own government. This casts doubt on the reading passage’s claim that the violent
uprising caused the Maya collapse.
Second,
according to the lecturer, it is wrong to say that the Maya cities collapsed
due to a sudden change of trade routes. This is because there There (this is because는 적절하지 않는 표현 입니다) is no historical
record associated with this event. Also, the destruction of Teotihuacan took
place before the Maya cities were abandoned. This refutes the reading passage’s
assertion that destruction of Teotihuacan and abrupt change of trade routes led
to a breakdown of the Maya Empire.
The
final point made by the lecturer is that the destruction of the Maya collapse
was not a result of the epidemic. This is supported by that there is no
evidence to support the reading passage’s claim (갑자기 아무 개연성없이 리딩에 대한 정보가 나온거 같습니다). Moreover, yellow fever and
malaria began from the Central America after the Maya collapse. This counters
the reading passage’s argument that the epidemic caused the breakdown of Maya
society.
점수: 22 리딩에 대한 정보가 많이 부족한 통합형 에세이입니다. 통합형 에세이에서 가장 중요한 부분을 차지하는 것은 한 주제에 대하여서 서로 다른 정보를 가지고 있는 리딩과 리스닝이 어떻게 비교하고 반박을 하는 것인지를 보는 것 입니다. 지금 이 에세이 같은 경우에 있어서는 리딩에 대한 부분이 각 단락에서 한 문장으로만 서술하였는데 한 문장으로 끝내는 것 보다는 리스닝을 좀 더 반박할 수 있는 부분들을 더 서술하시길 바랍니다. 수고많으셨습니다. |