Some people say that teachers should be paid regardless of their students’ academic performance. They insist that education 1) can not be compare with things that just pursue interesting. However I strongly insist that teachers should be paid according to how well students perform for two reasons. First, teachers are required to enhance their teaching abilities. Second, teachers can attain a sense of accomplishment and challenge. I will detail it.
** you need to explain about what the “teacher-evaluating system is, I guess this system is related to the system where teachers are promoted or get paid more on a basis of students’ performance.
Next, 1) it is possible for teachers to have achievement and a sense of challenge. Truly, some teachers feel rewarded for their efforts by being paid more. Without teacher compensations or incentive systems, teachers may feel unfair that all teachers receive the same salary. Indeed, they should be paid relative to their ability. 3) If were not for difference of the wages, they do not think their ability whether it is good or not. However, if they would receive a positive bonus owing to 4) increasing students’ grades, they feel a great deal of achievement. In addition, a growing number of 5) candidates can apply to teachers’ application test. Naturally, classes received students become too much invaluable. This shows that teachers can have a lot of motivation and rewarding
2) by doing lecture à lecture is a method of teaching
3) subject missing / who is “they”?
4) increase students’ test scores or raise students’ grades
5) who are the candidates? Are you talking about teacher candidates? Or are you talking about prospective students?