The lecturer describes the part that researchers are not considered and the possitive effects of the video games, which is direct opposition to the reading passage.
He says that although children spend much hours in front of the video game, they spend less time than watching TV. And they also show the same sympthoms of addictive when they watch TV or skiing. These findings contradicts the reading passage`s claim that since children spend too much time on playing the video game, they destroy their own life.
Next, the lecturer finds playing the video game beneficial for children in some aspects. After children played the video game thirty years ago, the volent rate becomes the lower than ever. It might be a way that children can remove their stress. Moreover, through playing the video game, children can get ablility to solve the problem and make decision faster, which are regarded highly appropriate values nowadays society, contrary to the reading passage. The reading passage argues that the violent video game encourages aggressive inclination and criminal behaviors, which somtimes connected with commiting murder behaviors. On top of that, the reading passage argues that the video games are just waste of time and not meaningful activities. |