▶ Your Answer :
According to the reading, there are ample supports for the author’s claim that sending people to an asteroid would be the best colonization option for human being. However, the professor in the lecture gives several reasons as a rebuttal to the author’s point.
First, the professor contends that low gravity contains sort of dangerous factors so sending people cannot be practical. In fact, in the low gravity circumstances, muscles and density of bones could become lower than on Earth. As a result, this can lead us to health problems. Imagine that people stay for a long term. Would it be possible for people to keep their health? That is what professor concerned. This casts doubt on the reading passage’s claim that asteroids are often much smaller than planets in our solar system, so they have lower gravity. This can make spaceships save their fuels when they take off. As the same case with it, landing for spaceship could be safer and possible to carry heavy equipment.
Next, the professor insists that author could not think the whole pictures, especially the price. In fact, the cost is going to increase increases as the fee of transport increase, so it cannot be profitable. Furthermore, values of metals would be the same as now. This is because their cost would be fallen as the supply goes up. Consequently, it cannot be profitable. This counters the reading passage’s assertion that some asteroids are rich in valuable elements such as gold and platinum, which means that it is pretty profitable for the Earth to bring them.
Finally, the professor argues that it is not easy to return from the asteroid. As a matter of fact, The asteroid is the unusual case for the Earth and there is still far from the Earth. Finally, people who will stay on the asteroid would travel much far away, which means it could be a challenge. This refutes the reading passage’s suggestion that asteroids are a good option for colonization because some of them would not be difficult to reach. This is because they are coming to the Earth closer periodically. Good: 24~30 점수: 25 대채로 서로 다른 정보를 가진 리딩과 리스닝을 적절하게 잘 비교하였습니다. 통합형 에세이에서 가장 중요한 것은 얼마나 적절하게 리딩과 리스닝을 비교했나입니다. 지금 이 에세이는 이러한 면에 있어서 잘 한 거 같습니다. 부족한 정보 없이 리딩과 리스닝 둘다 잘 비교하면서 서술하였습니다. 앞으로 이렇게 계속 통합형 에세이를 서술하시면 좋을 거 같습니다. 수고많으셨습니다. |