■ Direction You have 20 minutes to plan and write your response. Your response will be judged on the basis of The quality of writing and on how well your response presents the points in the lecture and the relationship to the reading passage. Typically, an effective response will be 150 to 225 words. ■ Question Summarize the points made in the lecture you just heard, explaining how they cast doubt on the points made in the reading
|
|
|
▶ Topic : carbon sequestration |
|
|
▶ Your Answer :
The
lecturer argues that the methods of reducing the amount of CO2 in atmosphere
are not working. This contradicts the reading passage’s claim that CO2 in
atmosphere can be reduced by storing in the ground or oceans.
First,
the lecturer contends that adding iron to the ocean does not cause the permanent
increase of phytoplankton. If the number of phytoplankton multiplies quickly,
the ocean runs out of Nitrogen and results the decrease in the number of
phytoplankton. Also, according to the study, fertile amount of iron in the
ocean can store only three percent of CO2 in atmosphere.
Next,
making artificial wetlands is not effective way to reduce CO2 in atmosphere.
According to the research, artificial wetlands store CO2 twenty three percent
less than natural ones. In addition, it takes long to develop artificial
wetlands, so it might be too late to set ideal ecosystem.
Finally,
the lecturer asserts that storing CO2 in coal mines can be problematic. If coal
bonds with CO2, methane release. The worse thing is that methane also has CO2.
Furthermore, not all CO2 attach to coal. Some coals leak out to atmosphere so the
quantity of CO2 cannot be reduced.
Fair: 17~23 점수: 20 일단 지금 구조적으로 보았을 때 통합형 에세이와 전혀 맞지않습니다. 리딩에 대한 정보가 아예 나타나지 않습니다. 이 에세이의 중요한 요점은 리딩과 리스닝을 얼마나 적절하게 잘 비교하엿나 입니다. 하지만 이러한 부분이 없으면 오히려 안좋은 효과가 나옵니다. 리딩의 정보를 꼭 서술하길 바랍니다. 또한 바디 2는 리딩 리스닝이 전혀 언급이 없습니다. 통합형 에세이는 최소 150자고 독립형은 최소 250입니다. 수고많으셨습니다.
Words: 195
|
|
질문있습니다! 통합형과 독립형 단어수는 제약이 없는건가요?