▶ Topic :
Both the speaker
and writer deal with the same topic: origination of dogs.
However, they have different perspective. ,
First,
in the reading passage, the author said that dogs evolved from wolves that were
tamed by humans as hunting animals. On the other
hand, in the lecture, the speaker refutes that ancient people could not catch the
wolves. Also, it was really hard to train wolves as a company which was difficult to make wolves as a companion.
Second,
the writer claimed that dogs were domesticated about 16,000 years ago. This is because
researchers Researchers (this is because는 적절하지 않는 표현 입니다) measured the differences in DNA among the modern dogs. With this, they were able to find their first ancestor. In conversely, the speaker claimed that the dogs’ first
ancestors existed earlier than 16,000 years
ago. This is because there are drawing which a boy was standing with a dog
in a cave and footprint on
the ground. There was evidence in which a boy standing with a dog in a cave and footprint on the ground
Finally,
according to the reading passage, dog was tamed
in China and then spread to other areas all around the world. Experts exactly
found the location by comparing genetic information. In contrast, the lecturer said the dogs were trained not only in
China but also in multiple countries such as
middle Asia and Europe.
To sum up, the speaker casts doubt on
the writer is argument for the three reasons stated above.
점수: 25 일단 두 가지 부분에 있어서 오류가 있습니다. 통합형 에세이 자체가 리딩과 리스닝을 비교하는 것이기 때문에 결론이 필요 없습니다. 또한 문법적 오류들이 많습니다. 제가 지적한 부분들을 숙지하면서 에세이를 서술하시길 바랍니다. 이러한 부분을 재외하고는 전체적으로 리딩과 리스닝을 잘 비교하였습니다. 수고많으셨습니다.
|