▶ Your Answer : Both the author of the article and the lecturer are talking about Transient Luar Phenomena, or TLPs. The author of the article mentions that TLPs can be caused by clouds of lunar gas, which is leaked out from underground. He states that most of the TLPs are seen around large craters where there is a high chance of gas expelling. However, the lecturer refutes this point. He notes that the hypothesis that TLPs cuased caused by gas is not plausible. He argues that the locations of TLPs matching with large craters is just a coincidences coincidence and we do not know how much gas exists on the moon surface. Moreover, the author says that TLPs can be caused by clouds of dust on the moon. He mentions that particles from space can hit the surface, causing dusts dust to levitate and reflect sunlight. The lecturer rebuts this points. He argues that there is no evidence of dust clouds that are large enough to actually reflect enough lights to form TLPs. The strong evidence that there is only low level of dust on the moon revealed by spaceship landed on moon backs his argument. (문장 정리가 필요해보입니다 - In fact, according to him, a spaceship revealed that there is a low level of dust on the moon, which backs his argument. ) Finally, the author states that solar flare illuminating parts of moon surface can be seen as TLPs. However, the lecturer contradicts this statement by saying that this hypothesis is based on insufficient amount of data. He mentions that this hypothesis came up by comparing times of solar flares and TLPs. Sometimes solar flares and TLPs happened at the same time, but it is not enough to corroborate the hypothesis (더욱 명확한 설명이 필요해보입니다)
감사합니다.!
Score: 21 Comments: - 전체적인 구조가 잘 잡혀있습니다.
- 사소한 문법 실수들이 있습니다.
- 지저분한 문장들이 있습니다. - 전체적으로 설명이 조금 더 명확했으면 하는 부분들이 있어요. 예를 들어 마지막 본론에선 설명을 굉장히 잘 해주셨는데, 교수의 반박을 설명하는데 있어서는 명확하지 못했던 것 같습니다. |