▶ Your Answer :
The professor cast
doubts on the reading passage's idea that the biopolymers, which is are an
environmental friendly plastic is a great solution to the ecological problem. However, the professor says that biopolymer's benefits
are still in question.
First of all,
the professor claims that the biopolymer is not
a great alternative for traditional plastic. According to the reading, the biopolymer is less harmful to the environment
because it disintegrates easily and emits less pollution using .
However, the professor says that it is overstated because the biopolymer needs a specific environment to be
disintegrated easily.
On top of that,
the professor assaults that the biopolymer is
not as beneficial to the environment as people may think. According to the
reading, the biopolymer is very sustainable and does not jeopardize the
environment for our future generatoin generations
environment. However the professor says that the
biopolymer needs a lot of natural crops like corn, potatoes and wheat to be produced and it can
be very devastate devastating for the agricultural environment.
Finally, the professor
rebuts the idea that the biopolymer is as
effective as traditional plastic. According to the reading, the biopolymer is already proven to be as sturdy as
traditional plastic in the market. However, the professor says that the
effectiveness of the biopolymer is not proven
yet.
Writing
0-30 Score Scale |
Fair (17-23) |
Score |
21 |
Overall
Comment: |
두 입장을 잘 비교하셨어요. 문법
오류들은 위 지적사항을 확인해 주세요. 글을 너무 짧게 쓰셨으니 문장을 더 추가하셔서 더 길게 써주시는 걸 추천합니다. |
|
|