▶ Your Answer : The reading passage and the listening discuss the topic of globalization. However, their perspectives are different. The reading argues that the advantages of globalization far outweigh the disadvantages of that, while the professor in the listening lecture disagrees and says otherwise. First, Frist, the passage states that people can get more opportunities to have a great job. To prove this point, the reading provides that workers can gain more money in foreign firms. On the other hand, the listening professor debunks the claim by stating that it is better to have an occupation in local areas. The professor also provides an example, saying that there can be a decrease (뭐가 줄어든다는 것인지 알 수 없습니다) in a local factory when most people get their jobs in foreign companies. Second, the reading further describes that workers can learn new skills in foreign companies. According to the writer, globalization can make people learn to get education cheaper. However, the listening lecture contradicts this by saying that it can be harmful to some companies. He explains it in detail: good accessibility can make copy easily. (어색한 표현입니다) Finally, the reading contends that it (it이 무엇인지 풀어서 써주세요) is helpful to consumers. The passage asserts that they can buy high-quality goods while (연결이 부자연스럽습니다 when으로 바꿔주시는 것이 더 좋을 것 같습니다.) many companies are competing to produce things due to globalization. Once again, the professor listening argues the claims by stressing stresses that globalization cannot always make people choose the cheapest product because there are a lot of tax on income foreign goods (어색한 표현입니다).
Score: 16 Comments: - 전체적으로 구조가 잘 잡혀있습니다.
- 단락과 단락 사이에 엔터로 스페이싱을 넣어주세요.
- Listening이라고 하지 마시고 professor/lecture라고 해주세요. - 어색한 표현들이 있습니다. - 문법 실수들이 있습니다. - 토픽 센텐스 (단락의 첫번째 문장)에는 it/she/they등 대명사를 사용하지 말아주세요. |