▶ Your Answer : According to the reading, there are three viable solutions to eliminate the emerald ash borers. On the contrary, the lecturer argues that the solutions are not available. He refutes each point made in the passage. First, the reading passage points out that the beetle can be diminished by removing affected trees. Nevertheless, the professor denies such point by positing that this method is ineffective. To elaborate, the symptoms of this disease appear in one or two years. Thus, it is too late to remove the trees when they noticed the affection. Another point that passage puts emphasis on is that synthesis treatment will stop the pest from diffusing. However, the speaker rejects this point by saying that it is greatly problematic. To be specific, the chemicals can contaminate the groundwater. Moreover, It would not be possible if there are a lot of larvae spread. Finally, the reading material asserts that the larvae can be removed by using wasps. On the other hand, the lecturer contradicts this statement by mentioning that there are many things to concern. Professor says the survival rate of wasps will be different depending on their regions. Also, this method can invoke unintended consequences. For example, the wasps would kill other lives.
Fair: 17~23 점수: 21 일단 전반적으로 리딩이나 리스닝 의 정보가 부족합니다. 통합형 에세이에서 젤 중요하게 보는 것 중에 하나는 한 주제에 대하여서 리딩과 리스닝이 어떻게 적절하게 잘 비교하고 있나 입니다. 지금 이 에세이 같은 경우에는 한 주제에 대하여서 리딩과 리스닝이 잘 비교가 되어야하는데. 두 정보들이 부족합니다. 따라서 좀 더 적절하게 정보들을 더 서술해주시길 바랍니다. 수고많으셧습니다.
|