The reading passage contends that the Indian state of Kerala experienced a rare weather phenomenon known as red rain. Reddish-brown rain sporadically fell throughout the region, and this bizarre weather caused much concern among local residents who believed it had a supernatural origin. However, there are rational explanations for this event. On the other hands, the lecturer brings up several points that contradict this argument.
First of all, the speaker argues that the red rain had expired because a lot of time was spent. There are not effects anymore. This casts doubt on the reading which states that the red rain contained the blood of bats. India is home to many species of bat that migrate in massive groups.
In addition, according to the speaker, a volcanic eruption had erupted in only India. There was no damage in the Philippines. This rebuffs the reading passage’s assertion that the red rain resulted from the volcanic eruption in the Philippines.
The final points made by the lecturer is that a chemical pollution was not in the city. There was no damage because it never was spread. This refutes the reading passage’s argument that the chemical pollution released from local factories caused the red rain phenomenon.
점수: 22
전체적으로 리딩에 대한 정보가 많이 부족한 통합형 에세이인거 같습니다. 통합형 에세이에서 가장 중요한 부분을 차지하는 것 중에 하나는 한 주제에 대하여서 서로 다른 정보를 가지고 있는 리딩이나 리스닝이 어떻게 비교하고 반박을 하는 것인지 잘 보여주는 겁니다. 지금 이 에세이는 구조적으로도 그렇고 리딩에 대한 정보를 한 문장만 서술하였습니다. 한 문장으로 리딩에 대한 부분을 끝내는 것 보다는 리스닝을 좀 더 반박할 수 있는 부분들을 더 서술하시길 바랍니다. 수고많으셨습니다.