▶ Your Answer :In this set of the materials, both the reading and the lecture deal with the gasoline prices increase. The lecture challenges the reading that in increasing gas taxes cannot be a solution to saving energy.
First and foremost, the reading insists that, people will not stop consuming even if gasoline prices increase . For example, when the government increase the cigarettes price, people keep buy it since there was no alternative things. However speaker goes on to say that people will reduce the consumption and attempt to use economically, because its too burdensome to people that using the gasoline.
Secondly, the author states that increasing gas taxes will put a financial burden on people who are commuting with private car. But the professor in the lecture argue that people can use public transportation such as bus, subway or carpool to commute so reduce the financial problems.
Lastly, the article maintain that government should make a car manufacturers develop cars using less gasoline. In contrast, the lecturer says that increasing the tax will be more efficient. Because consumer will going to buy a car that using less gasoline car to save money so they will keep push the company to develop a car.
점수: 26 리딩이나 리스닝 둘 다 정보가 너무 간략한 통합형 에세이입니다. 통합형 에세이에서 가장 중요하게 보는 것 중에 하나는 한 주제에 대하여서 서로 다른 정보를 가지고 있는 리딩과 리스닝이 어떻게 비교하고 반박을 하는 지를 보는 것 입니다. 지금 이 에세이 같은 경우에 있어서는 리딩이나 리스닝이 너무 설명이 부족합니다. 좀 더 자신의 이유를 더 서포트 할 수 있는 구체적인 부분들을 리딩과 리스닝에 더 서술하시길 바랍니다. 수고많으셨습니다. |