▶ Your Answer :
In the reading passage, there is ample support for the author’s claim that the origin of domesticated dogs. However, the professor gives several reasons as a rebuttal to the author’s point. First, the professor contends that it is hard to believe that ancient people domesticated wolves as hunting companions. For instance, while human set traps to catch the preys, wolves chase down preys. Due to different method it is difficult to catch the preys together. (Better mention earlier about the different hunting style) Also, wolves are arduous to train because they become aggressive as they grow. This casts doubt on the reading passage’s claim that human trained wolves to assist with hunting. Second, the professor insists that the domestication of dogs are happened much earlier than 16000 years ago. The footprints of boy and dog were discovered (where?) and it indicates that dog were domesticated earlier than 16,000 years. This counters the reading passage’s assertion that dogs were trained approximately 16,000 years ago. The researchers measured the discrepancies in DNA among present dogs and calculated the rates of mutation. Finally, the professor argues that dogs were domesticated in multiple places such as Europe, North America, Middle East and so on. (So that?) The oldest evidences discovered in many places. (Meaning?)Also, there are 4 distinct ancestors from different regions. This refutes the reading passage’s suggestion that the domestication of dogs started in China and it spread to the world. This is because, in southern China, there is the highest genetic diversity in dogs
채점기준표 | Grammar | Contents | Example | Coherence | 점수 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | Score | Limited 15-17 | - Reading에서 언급한 핵심내용과 Listening의 내용이 서로 명확하게 대조되지 못하고 있어요. 현재 제시된 포인트로는 리딩서머리가 더 정확합니다.
- Wolves are arduous한 것이 아닌 human이 feel hard to train wolves한 것 입니다.
|
|