The reading mainly presents that there are three
benefits that the development of an international fund to help developing
countries implement useful conservation techniques in forest protection is the
best way to protect the world’s forests. However, the lecturer challenges what
are stated in the passage by providing three evidences.
Firstly, in the reading, using the
internationally established forest protection fund to protect forest
agriculture is perhaps the most important initiative. In contrast, the lecturer
holds an opposing views, saying that farmers would increase much more their
production according to population. So, they would use agricultural
technologies such as fertilizers and pesticides. It causes serious problems such as water pollution because
pesticides and fertilizers include harmful chemical compounds. Deforestation rate
would increase much more.
Secondly, the passage asserts that use of this
protection fund could be used to improve the local areas by parceling out fund
to provide villagers and tribal resident . However, the professor also claims the opposite opinion that stipends and other
financial aid would would give to forest owners and villagers and tribal
residents do not get stipends and other financial aid. For this reason, it . It is not a
rational solution.
Finally, the author of the reading passage
believes that humans use many plants and animals for their convenience such as food and
etc. using the international fund to help government and people establish
protected forest areas is the best way to maintain valuable forest
biodiversity. On the other hand, the lecturer disagrees it with the point that
people use plants and animals for commercial purpose or their profit instead of
food, shelter, clothing and medicinal needs.
Good (24)
첫번째 본문
-리딩의 내용이 너무 적고, 리스닝의 내용이 너무 많습니다. 조금만 더 균형을 잡아주세요. 글의 전체적인 서로 주장하고 반박하는 내용이 더 잘 파악되도록 해주세요.
-it단수이므로 cause-->causes
두번째 본문
-the professor 단수이므로 claim-->claims
-would would 반복
-for this reason, 주어 +동사 로 나와야합니다.
-마지막 문장, for this reason, the professor claims that it is a rational solution으로 써주셔야 더 적절한 표현입니다. 본인은 중립적인 입장입니다.
세번째 본문
-reading passage 단수이므로 believe-->believes
-many 가 쓰였으므로 plant-->plants 복수
-리스닝의 내용을 좀더 마무리감있게 끝내주세요. 따라서, ~~~하였다 라는 내요이 필요합니다.
수고하셨습니다~~