▶ Your Answer :
The reading
passage asserts that smart cars would be beneficial for car drivers in terms of
safety, speed on the road and price. However, the lecturer totally refutes the
passage’s claim by stating that it is not clear that having smart cars would
give us benefits.
To begin with, the lecturer maintains
that smart cars would cause more accidents on the road. Since they make
themselves more tightly, they would be packed together on the high way (would be packed해서 뭘 말하려고 하는 지 모르겠습니다. 이러한 것 대문에 smart car가 문제점이 많은 건가요?). This is
antagonistic to the point of the reading passage that smart cars would prevent
accident by using sensors that detect several dangers.
Furthermore,
in the lecture, she contends smart cars do not have potential high speeds
because of the number of the smart cars. Since it is convenient to drive them,
there would be a lot of cars, which is not helpful for decreasing the driving
time. (리딩에 대한 부분은 어디에 있나요??? 통합형에세이는 리딩과 리스닝 둘 정보가 꼭 필요합니다)
Last the
lecturer asserts that smart cars could cost a lot because the sensors are
expensive, and repairing smart cars is also high-priced. This, however,
completely contradicts the reading passage that smart cars could save the costs
of driving. Fair: 17~23 점수: 21 일단 가장 큰 문제점은 두 번째 바디입니다. 통합형에세이 점수 구조에서 가장 중요한 것은 얼마나 적절하게 리딩과 리스닝의 정보를 분배하여서 서술하엿나 입니다. 하지만 두 번째 바디에서는 리딩의 정보가 아무것도 없습니다. 또한 리스닝에 대한 정보도 충분하게 서술되지 않아 보입니다. 따라서 리딩과 리스닝을 꼭 꼼꼼하게 읽어서 필요한 정보들은 다 서술하시길 바랍니다. 수고많으셨습니다 |