▶ Your Answer :
According to reading, there is ample support for author's claim that Greek soldier did not make use of mirrors when they attacked the city of Syracuse. However, the professor in the lecture gives several reasons as a rebuttal to the author's points.
First, the professor contends that the reason why there was no scientific evidence is that myriad of treatises had lost when library destroyed. Furthermore, In 423 B.C, the idea of parabolic mirror was mentioned. (Unclear examples) This casts doubt on the reading passage's assertion that curved mirror was not created when the war occurred.
Second, the professor insists that Greek soldier could target a ship since they were well trained. (Need supporting details) As a result, they could develope the skill and practive in concert. (Meaning?) This refutes the reading passage's suggestion that it is impossible to control elaborately with multiple mirrors.
Finally, the professor argues that once the ship caught on fire, it was difficult to extinguish. Since the ship used tar which is flammable, fire could become larger so that it was impossible to put out. (How does this relate to mirror attack) This counters the reading passage's claim that mirrors could not make the fire that resulted in burnt ship
채점기준표
|
Grammar
|
Contents
|
Example
|
Coherence
|
점수
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
Score
|
Limited 10-15
|
- 세 가지 주요 포인트를 적절히 잡아내지 못했습니다.
- 예시와 설명역시 Mirror attack과 연관지어 설명하지 못하고 있어요. - 포인트잡는 연습을 많이 해주셔야 할 것 같네요.
|
|