▶ Your Answer : Some people might say that the policy that high schools require all students to wear school uniforms is the better than the other in terms of controlling students effectively. However, in my opinion, the policy that high school enable students to decide what to wear in the school is the better choice than mandatory method. There are two reasons supporting my arguments. First, it can strengthen student's creativity in the long run aspect. Also, having a mandatory policy ultimately can cause student's insurgency. To begin with, permitting the students to select their apparel without any constraint can help develop creativity. Essentially, creativity can be based on the freedom status. So binding this status can hinder the development of creativity. Furthermore, having this capacity can lead people to succeed in this contemporary society with so many similar people. There was a survey conducted by a group of a business department, with 200 CEOs as respondents. The purpose of the study was to figure out the effect that the status without any constraint help creativity and this creativity can help them succeed. What they found was extremely intriguing. The overwhelming 85% grew up in the condition without any restraint and their high level of creativity could cause success. On top of that, Implementing the mandatory policy can cause people's unsatisfied situation. Actually, almost all people who argue forced uniform policy usually contend that allowing students to choose their apparel hinder control. But, it is totally untrue. guaranteeing student's freedom utmost with minimal restraint is the right method of control. I'll take my personal experience as an example to clarfy what I mean. When I was high school students, there were significant control policy in the school like hair style or the uniform. Of course, there were also many unsatisfied opinion from the students. One day, the crowd with students gathered the playground and spoked to their voice for 3 months. After that incident, the head of school acknowledged their voice and then permitted lots of things about students. The surprising things we could found out that after that time, ironically there was no need to control students because they took part in school's request. Taking developing their creativity and preventing the students from insurgency situation into consideration, permitting their apparral without any constrain is the better choice than the other. |