▶ Your Answer :
먼저 여쭤보고 싶은 게 한 가지가 있는데, 명료하게 'lecturer'를 바로 앞 문장에서 언급하고서 다음 문장에서는 lecturer를 she 혹은 he 로 지시하더라도 문제가 없을까요? 감사합니다!
The lecturer states that sucralose is not hazardous to human health. This contradicts the claim of the reading passage, asserting that sucralose should be banned for its related health issues. First of all, the lecturer points out that it is implausible that sucralose causes diabetes. No meaning can be associated with sucralose triggering insulin production, as other substances also display similar properties. Also, the lecturer finds the cause of diabetes among people drinking soda in obesity, not sucralose. This refutes the reading passage which adheres to the suggestion that sucralose is a cause for diabetes in humans. Next, the lecturer turns to the lack of evidence to the claim that sucralose is harmful when used for cooking. The laboratory experiment mentioned in the reading passage utilized materials that are not encountered in food, and it is also established that the researchers heated up the substance to temperatures not reached while cooking during the experiment. This counters the reading passage mentioning the dangers of sucralose when cooked. Finally, the lecturer asserts that sucralose doesn't induce allergic reactions. She dismisses accounts of such incidents as "anecdotal data" that is unworthy of being taken seriously. Moreover, tests have indicated there being no ground for the statement that sucralose triggers alergic reactions. This sheds doubt on how the reading passage considers allergic reactions to be a hazardous trait of sucralose.
우선 from reading/listening인지 정확하게 state하는 것이 좋습니다. he/she라고 스는 것은 상관없지만 그렇게 쓸 때에는 독자가 무조건 이해할 수 있도록 clarity를 보여줘야합니다. 어휘는 많이 기본적인 편입니다. 조금 더 다양하게 쓸 수 있도록 통합형 어휘 몇개 준비해놓는거 추천드립니다. |