▶ Your Answer :
The reading passage and the lecturer are both about GM crops. The author of the reading believes that GM crops benefit humans. On the other hand, the speaker brings up several points that contradict the specific points made in the reading.
First of all, the speaker points that GM crops cannot solve the matter of world hunger. This is attributed to the fact that there are already enough foods. It is true that many people on the planet do not have enough food to eat, but speaker points that it is a matter of distribution of food.
Moreover, in the lecture, the point is made that GM crops rather increase the price of food. Because GM crops need more water for growing, the crops will be much costly. As a result, the price of water and the seeds of crops will be expensive.
The final point made by the speaker is that vaccine cannot be more widely available than before. Vaccine is made of bananas and tomatoes, which can be spoiled easily. So, it has to be dealt carefully. This is different from the passage’s view that GM crops can produce vaccines that are made more widely edible.
While both the reading passage and the speaker deal with GM crops, the speaker effectively opposes all of the specific points presented in the reading.
점수: 22 일단 통합형 에세이에서는 결론이 필요없습니다. 통합형 에세이에서 하는 것은 한 주제에 대하여서 서로 다른 정보를 가진 리딩과 리스닝이 서로 어떻게 비교하고 반박하는 것인지 보는 거 입니다. 지금 이 에세이 같은 경우는 리스닝에 대한 정보는 충분하게 서술하였지만. 리딩에 대한 부분은 한 문장으로만 서술하였습니다. 따라서 리딩에 대한 정보를 좀 더 서술하시긻 바랍니다. 수고많으셨습니다. |