라이팅 인터미디엇 165
the lecturer claims that the Chinese map that contains America is like a fiction. This contradicts the reading's assertion that the Chinese people already proved the existence of America before Columbus arrived in 1492.
The first point made in the passage is that the old Chinese map shows America in 1418 with high accuracy.
The lecturer, however, challenges this particular viewpoint by arguing that the old Chinese map was made after Columbus's exploration.
To be specific, he states that the Chinese map did not exist in China and that was translated into Chinese. as it was translated in later times.
Another point the article puts an emphasis on is that a lot of
Chinese artifacts are uncovered in North America before Columbus.
In contrast, he contends the lecturer contends that the marker is not clear as much as proving the artifacts is Chinese.
He further indicates that Viking who was in America is clear due to a lot of remains.
But, in comparison a Viking's proof Chinese coin, that is so clumsy evidence.(이 부분을 통하여서 하고자 하는 말이 무엇인가요? 이해가 되지 않습니다)
Finally, it is stated in the reading that the Chinese taught people the lacquering technique who were in America.
On the contrary, it is accentuated in the lecture that the Chinese older using of technique of lacquering is not more than coincidence.
He gives a detail that the Pyramid was built in America and Egyptian. But, it doesn't prove their contact
점수: 22
리딩에 대한 정보가 많이 부족한 통합형 에세이 입니다. 통합형 에세이에서 가장 중요한 부분을 차지하는 것 중에 하나는 한 주제에 대하여서 서로 다른 정보를 가진 리딩과 리스닝이 서로 어떻게 비교하고 반박하는 지를 보는 것 입니다. 지금 이 에세이 같은 경우에 있어서는 리스닝에 대한 정보는 충분하게 잘 전달하고 있지만 리딩에 대한 정보는 한 문장으로만 서술되어 잇습니다. 리스닝을 좀 더 반박할 수 있는 리딩에 대한 정보를 더 서술하시길 바랍니다. 수고많으셨습니다.