Acutal test 7
In the lecture, the speaker from the listening contends that the reading's claim is groundless. This casts doubt on the reading's point that there are the health problems associated with sucralose.
First, the speaker argues that it does not mean that insulin from sucralose develops (주어 동사 불일치) diabetes even if sucralose cause the chemical to produce. In other words, diabetes are generated by various factors such as potatoes. Therefore, sucralose is not the main factor for developing diabetes. This is in contradictory to the reading passage's insistence that if people consume sucralose, they are at a greater risk for developing diabetes.
Second, the speaker maintains that generating toxic compounds when sucralose is cooked is not true. This means the ingredients in test does not (동사가 없습니다) ingredients that are used in real life. That is, the harmful chemicals are not found in food we normally eat. Also, they used the way of heating at (전치사) a higher temperature than normal. This is in direct opposition to the reading passage's assertion that when people use sucralose for cooking, it produces harmful substances.
Last, the speaker mentions that there are not sufficient evidence about allergic problems from sucralose. Experts said that the relationship between allergic reactions and sucralose is unreliable. People just imagine that allergic symptoms might be the result from sucralose. This rebuts the reading passage's point that it can set off intense allergic reactions.
-
1. 디테일이 굉장히 부족한 편입니다.
주어진 자료에서 최대한 많은 evidence를 뽑아서 상세하게 서술해주세요!
2. 사소한 문법 오류가 잦은 편입니다. proof-reading을 꼼꼼하게 해주세요.
(특히 관사와 전치사)
3. evidence 는 불가산 명사입니다. 따라서 복수형이 오거나 앞에 a/an 관사가 붙을 수 없습니다.