▶ Your Answer : The reading passage shows concern of sending astronauts to Mars, while the professor sees going to the Mars as plausible. The reading passage's worries are Mars's dust, psychological and financial problems. The professor believes that all of the problems can be overcome.
To begin with, the professor casts doubt on reading passage's assert that dust on Mars will be problematic, thus going to Mars are not advisable. The professor explains that it was proved that the sound technology, or using specific frequency can be used to get rid of detrimental dust on Mars. It is an effective way to clear out dust and the ship and astronauts will be safe.
The professors continues the lecture by giving opposite point to that of the reading, which is that psychological impact can be prevented beforehand. The reading passage argues that there will be no way to help abysmal astronauts in space as there is no real-time communication with Earth. However, the professor gives examples of therapies and programs that can be used to avoid psychological collapse. For instance, astronauts can use recorded videos when they feel down.
Finally, the professor asserts that the cost that need in the Mars expedition cannot drag one country out of the expedition. He continues the lecture by giving past international collaboration as an example, thereby disagreeing with the reading's idea. The professor mentions that all the countries that are interested can participate in the plan and as collaboration was once happened, it is manageable. Also, the professor assures that even without a success in expedition, only a participation can be enough success. This completely counters the reading, as reading passage says that costing money in to expedition that has low probability of success will not be bring benefit to country.
최대한 디테일 살리려 노력했습니다 ㅎㅎ. 혹시 더 디테일이 필요하다 싶으면 언급 해주세요.
|